Democracy questioned

  • 2011-11-17
  • From wire reports

RIGA - Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia have experienced a sharp drop in commitment to the principles of democracy and free markets, whilst some other countries register a surprising upswing, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development points out in its report ‘Crisis and Transition: The People’s Perspective,’ reports
In 2010, democracy and market support levels decreased in the Baltic States and other European Union member states. Bulgaria was the only exception; however, these principles had few supporters in the country already in 2006.
This Transition Report 2011 analyzes a wealth of data contained in a survey of some 39,000 people, primarily from emerging Europe.

The third in a trilogy of annual Transition Reports assessing the impact of the crisis on the region where the EBRD invests, this year’s report also explores why the crisis affected ordinary households in the transition region far more than in Western countries and analyzes the factors that support the development of successful entrepreneurship in the transition region.
Building on the data, the Transition Report concludes that attitudes to democracy and the free market can be explained partly by the experiences of individual groups during the crisis. People became less supportive of democracy if the recent crisis hit them hard relative to their memories of past crises.

The findings of the report suggest that markets and democracy lost support in the more advanced transition countries because they experienced deeper downturns in this crisis than in earlier recessions in the early and mid 1990s. By comparison, the most recent crisis was generally milder in CIS countries than the output decline that followed the collapse of communism.
The report also finds compelling evidence to suggest that the crisis made people “turn against what they had.” Those who lived in more market-oriented and democratic societies and were affected by the crisis became less likely to choose democracy and markets over other systems.

On the other hand, support for democracy and markets actually rose - in some cases quite sharply - in some of the less-advanced economies, especially in the former Soviet Union. The report says: “This is particularly true of crisis-hit people in the CIS countries who perceived a high degree of corruption. It may be that for those individuals, the crisis diminished any sympathy they may have had for state-led systems.”

According to the latest survey, Albania, Mongolia, Montenegro, Tajikistan, Turkey and Uzbekistan remained among the countries with the highest levels of democracy support in the region. In the new survey, they were joined by Georgia, Kazakhstan, Belarus as well as Armenia, the country that saw the biggest change in democracy support levels in the past four years, showing a 28-point increase that brought it up from the 26th position in the region to 2nd, just behind the 2010 regional leader, Tajikistan.

Among the more advanced transition countries, the backing for democracy dropped off particularly sharply in the Slovak Republic, Slovenia and Hungary, with the Slovak support decreasing by over 20 percentage points. The Transition Report also highlights the impact of the crisis on households in the transition region, pointing out that ordinary people were hit far harder by the downswing than their counterparts in Western Europe.

A sharper reduction in consumption in the EBRD region can be traced to more severe shocks such as job losses, as well as the less-effective safety nets that were available in emerging Europe to cope with such personal setbacks.
But the report also homes in on the impact of bank borrowing, especially linked to loans taken out before the crisis which may have left some households across the transition region vulnerable. It notes that while mortgages supported consumption during the crisis in the West, they had the opposite effect in the transition region, with this trend linked primarily to the take-up of foreign exchange-denominated mortgages in countries that experienced significant currency depreciation.

The chapter detailing the factors that support entrepreneurship finds that women are less likely to attempt to set up a business, but no less likely to succeed than men once they try. It concludes that this may argue for policies targeted at encouraging potential female entrepreneurs.