RIGA - Latvian Minister of Defense Artis Pabriks (For Development) is skeptical about the proposal to establish a European rapid reaction force.
Pabriks told LETA that he saw no reason to talk about a European rapid reaction force if, for more than a decade, "we have not been able to use existing EU battlegroups".
"Each country has to think about its capabilities and where to use those capabilities in practice and how to help each other. It doesn't make sense to start something new all the time if it remains more or less unused. Have we sent existing battle groups to any of the zones at least once? I am skeptical about the need to create alternative structures until the previous ones are actually used," the Minister emphasized.
The AFP news agency reports that EU defense ministers on Thursday weighed proposals for a European rapid reaction force after the bloc was sidelined during the US-led evacuation from Afghanistan.
Calls have grown for the 27-nation group to develop its own joint military capability to respond quickly to crises in the wake of the chaotic scenes at Kabul airport after the Taliban seized power.
"Afghanistan has shown that deficiencies in our strategic autonomy come with a price and that the only way forward is to combine our forces and strengthen not only our capacity but also our will to act," EU foreign affairs chief Josep Borrell told journalists after the meeting in Slovenia.
"If we want to be able to act autonomously and not be dependent on the choices made by others, even if these others are our friends and allies, then we have to develop our own capacities."
Among the propositions is a plan, first aired in May, to set up a 5,000-strong force as part of a review of the EU's overall strategy due to be presented in draft form in November.
But the proposal is yet to gain EU-wide support, and there are major doubts over whether there is the political will to engage such a force. The bloc, for instance, never used a system of so-called battlegroups it set up in 2007.
"The EU and its Member States must carry greater weight in the world -- to defend our interests and values and to protect our citizens," European Council President Charles Michel wrote in an online post.
"The chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan forces us to accelerate honest thinking about European defense."
Slovenian Defense Minister Matej Tonin -- whose country holds the EU's rotating presidency and hosted the meeting at the state-owned Brdo Castle estate northwest of the capital Ljubljana -- estimated that a rapid response force could number "5,000 to 20,000" personnel.
He called for a new system that would see troops from "willing countries" dispatched in the name of the EU if just a majority of member states agreed, rather than the unanimity required for the battlegroups.
In Washington, President Joe Biden's administration indicated it would welcome such a force, which comes after years of US pressure on NATO allies to share more of the burden by boosting military spending.
"We continue to believe that a stronger, more capable Europe is in our shared interests," State Department spokesman Ned Price told reporters.
"When the democracies that make up the EU stick together, they constitute a tremendous force for a stable and open international order."
But he said that the European Union and NATO should coordinate to "avoid duplication and potential waste of scarce resources".
German Defense Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer said the lesson from Afghanistan was that Europe must be able to "act more independently" to be a credible actor.
But she insisted "it is very important that we don't act as an alternative to NATO and the Americans".
She appeared to push back against the idea of a standing force, saying on Twitter that "coalitions of the willing" among member states could come together to tackle future crises.
Latvian minister Artis Pabriks said the bloc needed to show it had the "political will" to use any force if the plan was to lead anywhere.
He noted that the battlegroups program has been around for over a decade as part of the EU's common defense policy, but asked, "Have we ever used it?"
Debate has raged for decades over what role Brussels should play on defense. EU member nations -- most of which are also NATO allies -- have often been reluctant to agree on moves to integrate military capabilities.
Ambitions on common defense have gathered steam in recent years in part due to the exit from the bloc of Britain, which was opposed to anything that might lead to a European army or dilute support for NATO.